It is forecast to be Chance of a Thunderstorm at 10:00 PM PST on February 28, 2015
Chance of a Thunderstorm
Home » Santa Clarita News » Breaking News » State Supreme Court Denies Palmdale Review Of CVRA Decision
State Supreme Court Denies Palmdale Review Of CVRA Decision

State Supreme Court Denies Palmdale Review Of CVRA Decision

This is a breaking news story and more information will be added as it becomes available.

California Supreme Court justices will not review an appellate panel’s decision finding Palmdale’s at-large elections violate the California Voting Rights Act, an attorney for the plaintiff said Wednesday.

Don’t miss a thing. Get breaking Santa Clarita news alerts delivered right to your inbox.

“Palmdale is running out of options and will have to soon face the fact that its elections have been illegal,” said Kevin Shenkman, who represents the plaintiffs. 

“We’re very pleased that the California Supreme Court has denied another one of Palmdale’s frivolous appeals, which is an extreme abuse of its taxpayers’ dollars,” he said.

Palmdale officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the decision.

Shenkman also is representing the plaintiffs in cases that were filed against several Santa Clarita Valley entities.

Related: County System Can’t Handle Cumulative Voting, Local November Elections

The status of those lawsuit settlements is still being determined, as the city of Santa Clarita — one of three entities that entered into settlement negotiations with Shenkman & Hughes —  recently questioned the validity of their own settlement with a motion due to be addressed Sept. 5. 

From a previous story:

Related: Santa Clarita Questions Legality Of Voting Rights Lawsuit Settlement

The filing is a result of Santa Clarita officials’ uncertainty over whether their agreed-upon settlement is legal and feasible, saidJoe Montes, Santa Clarita city attorney.

Plaintiffs in the California Voting Rights Act lawsuit against Santa Clarita

“If cumulative voting is not permitted and we’re not allowed to change the election date, then the parties will have to confer again as to how the matter will proceed,” Montes said. “It could mean that the litigation resumes, it could mean settlement talks could have to resume — that’s just too far off to speculate at this point.”

Shenkman, who represents the plaintiffs against the city, Jim Solizand Rosemarie Sanchez-Fraser, called the city’s stance “bizarre,” and questioned why Santa Clarita city officials would authorize a settlement and then question its legality.

“The CVRA gives the power to courts to find appropriate remedies for a California Voting Rights Act violation,” said Kevin Shenkman, who’s representing the plaintiffs. “In a lot of ways, the city would prefer to do cumulative voting (as opposed to district-based elections), so (the brief) doesn’t make any sense.”

Do you have a news tip? Call us at (661) 298-1220, or drop us a line at

KHTS AM 1220 - Santa Clarita News - Santa Clarita Radio

Source: Santa Clarita News

State Supreme Court Denies Palmdale Review Of CVRA Decision

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

About Perry Smith

Perry Smith is a print and broadcast journalist who has won several awards for his focused, hyperlocal community coverage in several different regions of the country. In addition to five years of experience covering the Santa Clarita Valley, Smith, a San Fernando Valley native, has worked in newspapers and news websites in Los Angeles, the Northwest, the Central Valley and the South, before coming to KHTS in 2012. To contact Smith, email him at