Action Family Counseling – Banner
SCV Senior Center – Touch A Truck 2015 – Banner
PizzaRev – Banner
Santa Clarita Autosound – Banner
Santa Clarita Transit – Dump the Pump – Banner
Newhall Land – 2015 – Banner
Galpin Motors – Banner
Disneyland – Diamond Celebration – Banner
SCV Chinese School – Banner 2
Green Convergence – Sun Power – Banner
Union Bank – Banner
Brent’s Carpet One – Banner
AV Party Rental – Banner
Facey – Banner
Newhall Land – Banner
SCV Chinese School – Banner
San Diego Zoo – Generic – Banner
Beyond Harmony – Banner
All Americans Bail Bonds – Banner
Valencia Town Center – Farmer’s Market – Banner
IHOP – Banner
Patterson’s Collision Center – Banner
Nothing Bundt Cakes – Banner
Hugo Naturals – Banner
Academy Swim Club – Banner
College Of The Canyons – Banner
Adage IT – Banner
Simply Taylored – Banner
It is forecast to be Mostly Cloudy at 7:00 PM PDT on May 22, 2015
Mostly Cloudy
Home » Santa Clarita News » Conviction Appeal Brings Surprise Testimony

Conviction Appeal Brings Surprise Testimony

khts_crime_chpEdward Contreras was convicted of the murder of Freddy Walker in 1997, but the man convicted of being his partner in the murder, Scott Taylor, is now testifying that Contreras is innocent.

In 1997, the Daily News reported that Taylor and Contreras were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for first-degree murder.  The two reportedly lured Walker to a barbecue at Taylor’s parents’ Bouquet Canyon Road home, robbed him of his recently cashed $600 Social Security check, dismembered his body, and disposed of the pieces off Pine Canyon Road.


Don’t miss a thing. Get breaking news alerts delivered right to your inbox

“The theory of the prosecution was that [Contreras] had planned a robbery of Freddy Walker along with Scott Taylor and then they lured him to this barbecue where then he was killed, dismembered, robbed, and his body was dumped,” said Justin Brooks, Director of the California Innocence Project, who is representing Contreras during his appeal.

However, after speaking to Contreras, Taylor, Garringer, and other witnesses, Brooks believes there is another, more likely, story to be told.

Brooks said that Taylor called the claim that he had planned to rob Walker “nonsense.”  Taylor told Brooks that his girlfriend had admitted to having a physical relationship with Walker and when Taylor confronted Walker, the situation blew up.

A witness, Lisa Garringer, testified in 1997 that Contreras attacked Walker along with Taylor.  She is now claiming to have misspoken and that she did not correct her statement 15 years ago because she was afraid of Taylor.

“She was scared to death of Scott Taylor and she thought if she retracted any of her statement, Scott would get off and he would come and kill her,” said Brooks.

Brooks believes she misspoke during her report to the police, because “she was very freaked out, they had been drinking all day, she was 16 years old, and she saw this guy get his head cut off.”

Garringer is now testifying that she and Contreras were both afraid while they watched Taylor attack Walker.  After creating a ruse that she had a dentist appointment the next day, Garringer had her mother pick her up from the home.  Contreras stayed with Taylor for the next couple days and went along with him to dispose of the body, fearing that Taylor would turn on him.

Brooks said that Taylor stated that he knew that Garringer and Contreras were scared and was in control of the situation.

Garringer’s mother will be testifying at the trial in Van Nuys today that her daughter had given wrong information, but did not know what to do about it.

“This is a crazy, spontaneous act and no other theory makes sense.” said Brooks.

Brooks questions why, if Contreras and Taylor had actually planned to rob Walker, they invited him, and several other people, to a barbecue, at Taylor’s parents’ home. “If the plan was to kill him, it was just ridiculous the amount of work it took and the number of ways to get caught.”

Though uncertain of Taylor’s motivations for offering this new evidence, Brooks said that Taylor, after having spent 15 years on prison, feels terrible that Contreras is in prison for something he did not do.

“If the prosecution case is undermined, which we believe it has been, the judge can reverse the conviction.  The State is free to re-prosecute [Contreras] for the crime again if they feel like they’ve got a sufficient case to do that, or he should be released.” said Brooks.


Conviction Appeal Brings Surprise Testimony

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

About KHTS AM 1220

AV Party Rental – News Banner
Beyond Harmony – News Banner
College Of The Canyons – News Banner
All American Bail Bonds – News Banner
Hugo Naturals – News Banner
Action Family Counseling – News Banner
Academy Swim Club – News Banner
Wicall’s Carpet
Newhall Land – 2015 – Tile
Manzanillo Restaurant – Tile
Green Convergence – Tile
Santa Clarita Autosound – Tile
SCV Chinese School – Tile