Supervisor Kathryn Barger and Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva have both formally opposed a recently proposed amendment to the Los Angeles County charter that would reallocate funds to “direct community investment” and “alternatives to incarceration.”
https://www.facebook.com/LosAngelesCountySheriffsDepartment/videos/309753690178503/?v=309753690178503
On Tuesday, Los Angeles County Supervisors Sheila Kuehl and Hilda Solis introduced a motion that directs county staff to “prepare a report on the processes and procedures associated with the placement of a County Charter Amendment on the November 2020 general election ballot, subject to the approval of a simple majority of the voters of the County.”
The amendment would “set a baseline minimum threshold of at least 10%, phased in by 2024, of our locally generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund (“Net County Cost”) to be allocated on an annual basis” to direct community investment” and “alternatives to incarceration.”
“To address racial injustice, over-reliance on law enforcement interventions, limited economic opportunity, health disparities, and housing instability, it’s time to structurally shift our budget priorities and reimagine Los Angeles County,” the motion reads.
The motion is a first step towards amending the county’s charter. After officials draft the necessary documents, the board is set to vote for the exact language of the amendment that would be placed on the ballot for voters to decide on in November.
“We believe L.A. County voters will embrace and ratify this structural change, which will require a persistence and commitment that extends beyond any one elected leader’s term or budget year,” the motion reads. “The challenges we seek to solve have built up over decades, and will be solved over decades.”
While the motion passed 4-1, Supervisor Barger stood as the only member of the Board of Supervisors to give an “enthusiastic” no.
“This motion threatens the County’s ability to provide ample protections and continue to fund crucial programs and services should the County face another catastrophic event in the short or long term,” Barger said in a statement released Tuesday afternoon.
See Related: L.A. County Supervisors Request Equitable Education Access For Virtual Learning
Sheriff Villanueva, who had vocally opposed the motion since it was added to the board’s agenda at the “last minute” late Friday, took to social media Wednesday, decrying the proposed amendment as “a bad idea on steroids.”
“It’s a dystopian future that awaits us, where law enforcement doesn’t exist or rarely exist, and leaves everyone to fend for themselves,” Villanueva said.
Currently, roughly 42 percent of the $8.8 billion the county’s “Net County Costs” (NCC) are allocated for “law enforcement and legal system uses.”
“This budget allocation does not reflect this Board’s values and priorities, nor does it position the County to robustly and adequately invest in community-based counseling and mental health services, youth development programs, small businesses and jobs, or affordable housing,” the motion reads. “A redistribution of resources is needed.”
Villanueva repeatedly compared the impacts of the amendment to the “Mad Max” film series, and stated that the Board of Supervisors were not listening to the community as a whole when it came to this issue.
“The only people they were listening to are the currently and formerly incarcerated,” he said. “The overwhelming majority of the community actually likes law and order, actually likes a sense of normalcy.”
Barger said that the county already allocates millions of dollars each year to many of the programs that the charter amendment seeks to fund, such as services for individuals at risk of entering the justice system, youth programs, and affordable housing.
“The charter amendment process that is proposed will nullify any meaningful dialogue or policy deliberations for years to come and prevent the ability for these policy matters to be addressed during meetings of the Board of Supervisors in full view of the public and with greater intentionality and accountability,” Supervisor Barger continued. “On a topic of this import, robust discussion and community engagement, along with ample analysis is imperative to ensure thoughtful policy decision making. Unfortunately, that was not the case in this instance.”
The full motion can be read here.
Sponsored Articles
KHTS FM 98.1 and AM 1220 is Santa Clarita’s only local radio station. KHTS mixes in a combination of news, traffic, sports, and features along with your favorite adult contemporary hits. Santa Clarita news and features are delivered throughout the day over our airwaves, on our website and through a variety of social media platforms. Our KHTS national award-winning daily news briefs are now read daily by 34,000+ residents. A vibrant member of the Santa Clarita community, the KHTS broadcast signal reaches all of the Santa Clarita Valley and parts of the high desert communities located in the Antelope Valley. The station streams its talk shows over the web, reaching a potentially worldwide audience. Follow @KHTSRadio on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
I commend Supervisor Barger for being strong and voting “no” on this.
Agreed. Thankfully there are still some voices of reason and opposition left in this state. A lawless society cannot be the goal.
both posters are spot on.
Here is a proposal. Using the lefts goal of a 10% reduction in funding, give communities 1 year to reduce total crime in every measurable category by that amount and reduce funding accordingly. The minute crime goes up, the funding goes back up. Crime goes down, funding goes down. It gives society something to perform to. The left will never agree to this (nor will the Unions), or they would try to fudge the numbers as their goal is no police, no jails (except for their personal protection or when imposing their enforcement on others). I dont often agree with Villanueva but he is 100% right on this. It is pretty simple, commit less crime and we will need less policing. The goal in every society should be minimal police but it has to be proceeded by a civilized society committing minimal crime FIRST. And no society of any scale has demonstrated this capability. In addition, societies with strong morality and value systems and harsher punishments tend to have far lower crime rates. All we do in CA is reduce punishment which has raised crime. 3 strikes is a perfect example. A certain percentage of humanity will commit crimes given the chance when faced with minimal consequence.
Thank you Kathryn for watching out for us, the taxpayers. I knew voting for you was a smart move. !
Anyone who is for defunding need to ride along with the deputies in less than desirable divisions for a week solid and for the entire shift . Not sleepy stations!
Good luck SCV community developments. Our community will not be able to remain safe and crime suppressed. So much for AwesomeTown. Thanks for nothing Board Members. Who probably reside behind gates and security systems. Rely on policing to keep their community safe. But let’s go ahead and ruin ours.
Amazing there was only ONE voice of reason on the board. Thank You Supervisor Kathryn Bargar
Does anyone know if this impacts SCV’s funding for LA County Sheriffs? Maybe just the unincorporated parts like Stevenson Ranch?
Thank you supervisor Barger! Amazing that we only have one voice of reason left in LA County.
The board of Supervisors did however pass the DISGUSTING ‘antiracist’ motion which was the 3rd item on the agenda. It is a BLACKS ONLY motion to FAVOR BLACKS ONLY in HOUSING, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, HEALTHCARE, EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL SERVICES, ETC . .all only BLACKS.
What happened to the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the California Constitution Sec 31? Shameful displays of partisan pandering and bowing down to the mob at the expense of the people who work and generate the tax revenue.
How about this? No crime the law enforcement will defund it self. No criminals no reason for Law enforcement. That does not seem to bee the case. Do not commit crimes Do not resist arrest. Do not get hurt by the POPO. Thank you sympathizers