Home » Podcasts » Chiquita Canyon Landfill Expansion Still Seeking Val Verde Support
Chiquita Canyon Landfill Expansion Still Seeking Val Verde Suppo
Chiquita Canyon Landfill Expansion Still Seeking Val Verde Suppo

Chiquita Canyon Landfill Expansion Still Seeking Val Verde Support

 A Chiquita Canyon landfill expansion project could go before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in spring of next year, according to county officials.


Sponsored Articles


Don’t miss a thing. Get breaking Santa Clarita news alerts delivered right to your inbox.

 The 639-acre landfill site, which is owned by Waste Connections and permitted for about 257 acres of waste, is looking to double its daily disposal limits, set aside of land for a potential conversion technology site, improve its entrance and support facilities and extend the life of the landfill, to name a few of the project’s goals.

 “The final (environmental report) should be ready in December or early next year,” said Edel Vizcarra, deputy planning manager for Supervisor Michael Antonovich. “Once that’s completed, the item still needs to go before the Planning Commission and possibly the Board of Supervisors.”

The 639-acre landfill site, which is owned by Waste Connections and permitted for about 257 acres of waste, is looking to double its daily disposal limits, set aside of land for a potential conversion technology site, improve its entrance and support facilities and extend the life of the landfill, to name a few of the project’s goals.

The 639-acre landfill site, which is owned by Waste Connections and permitted for about 257 acres of waste, is looking to double its daily disposal limits, set aside of land for a potential conversion technology site, improve its entrance and support facilities and extend the life of the landfill, to name a few of the project’s goals.

 March or April is the estimated time frame for when it could be in front of the county again, Vizcarra said.

 While the capacity is expected to double, the ramp up is expected to happen gradually over several years, said John Musella, a Chiquita Canyon landfill representative. However, Chiquita Canyon would like to get construction of the new entry facility under way as soon as possible, he said.

 To that end, Chiquita Canyon officials have been working with two community advisory group in order to garner their neighbors’ support for the project.

 The landfill is negotiating with two groups, the Castaic Area Town Council and the Val Verde Community Advisory Committee.

 Castaic officials submitted a 6-4 vote in mid-September, when they agreed to accept funds from Chiquita Canyon Landfill officials for the community, said Lloyd Carder, a Castaic resident.

Related:  Castaic OKs Chiquita Canyon Money; No Deal Yet For Val Verde

 A key part of the financial arrangement gives 80 cents per ton — based on annual disposal amounts — to the Castaic and Val Verde communities, said Musella. The financial arrangement calls for support once the final enviormental report is released by the county, Musella said.

 “(The CATC) agreed to split the funds with 70 percent to Val Verde and 30 percent to Castaic,” he said in a previous interview. “Basically, what that means is in the first year, Castaic would receive approximately $240,000 (according to 2013 tonnage), and Val Verde is set to receive $560,000.”

The money is planned to go to a new nonprofit organization, the Chiquita Canyon -Castaic Community Benefit Fund, Musella said. It will not go directly to the council.

The VVCA has yet to agree to terms with Chiquita Canyon officials, Musella said, however, talks have been ongoing..

The VVCA voted 112-0 to oppose the landfilll expansion project over the summer, according to Ramon Hamilton, who’s been handling public relations for the community group.

Both sides remain in negotiations for a potential compensation package to benefit the community in and around the landfill in exchange for support for the project.

The landfill currently pays into a fund that supports community activities in the Val Verde area. The current negotiations would extend that support if the landfill expansion is granted, Hamilton said.

“The next major thing that the community will be involved in is once we have an agreement we feel is worthy of sharing with the community is we’ll go over it and get their take on it,” Hamilton said. “Nothing is going to happen without community approval.”

The VVCAC is currently opposed to the project, but the situation could change with a majority vote, he said.

The current permitted closure date for the landfill is 2019, but based on the current tonnage limits, the projected closure date is between 2015 and 2019, according to the draft impact study.

Waste Connections, which owns the landfill, has applied for a new permit to implement the revision, which is what prompted the review and environmental study.

 The environmental impact report is currently being reviewed by county officials, who are working with a representative paid by Chiquita Canyon to address any concerns about the project, which were submitted during the public comment period.

“Chiquita Canyon continues its business as usual, we’re continuing to be a partner in the local community,” Musella said. “The EIR process is currently reviewing public comments, and all those comments and questions will be responded to in the final EIR.”

Do you have a news tip? Call us at (661) 298-1220, or drop us a line at community@hometownstation.com.

KHTS AM 1220 - Santa Clarita Radio

Chiquita Canyon Landfill Expansion Still Seeking Val Verde Support

4 comments

  1. Just want to clarify a few things.

    1. The Val Verde Civic Association (VVCA) is the group negotiating with the landfill, not the Val Verde Community Advisory Committee (VVCAC). Easy mistake to make, but it really needs to be corrected.

    2. The VVCA did not vote on the landfill expansion. The VVCA held a meeting in which COMMUNITY members voted either for or against the expansion. The vote was 112-0 opposing it. Based on the community vote, the VVCA officially stands behind the community and is opposed to the expansion.

    • Ramon,

      I am very much against this expansion. The Chiquita Landfill already has a ration of 1 landfill per 22 transfer sites–the highest in all of California. Why? Because we are taking waste and toxins and traffic from all over Southern California. This is very dangerous–although the money to these communities is tempting and the Landfill is great on PR–we need to say NO–and other cities can ship their waste by rail to Mesquite in the desert where it will not impact the jealth and wellbeing of so many people. The danger zone already extends into two schools including SCVi, and to parks where our kids play. as a cancer survivor who works in this area please hear my plea to not expand this landfill. we need to refuse a lot of the trash traffic that is causing much congestion on our roads, wear and tear, pollution and leachate in our water and ground. Very dangerous.

  2. The whole truth is not being told. The contract the landfill wants everyone to agree to specifically says no one can talk bad about the landfill.

    The landfill took in radioactive waste in 1992 and in 2011 toxic waste from an auto dismantler in Orange County, which was sued by Steve Cooley and won the suit against the auto dismantler and Chiquita Canyon Landfill. The violation in 2011 was a blatant violation of the CUP (Conditional Use Permit). Also they took in sludge in July 2011, again against the CUP and the agreement with Val Verde.

    They don’t want to admit to all these violations. but I can show the documentation.

  3. Great article Perry! Can you share where the “permitted for about 257 acres of waste,” came from? I have only seen restrictions on the CUP pertaining to the amount of tonnage the landfill can take in and not the acres but I may not be looking in the right spot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Perry Smith

Perry Smith is a print and broadcast journalist who has won several awards for his focused, hyperlocal community coverage in several different regions of the country. In addition to five years of experience covering the Santa Clarita Valley, Smith, a San Fernando Valley native, has worked in newspapers and news websites in Los Angeles, the Northwest, the Central Valley and the South, before coming to KHTS in 2012. To contact Smith, email him at Perry@hometownstation.com.