Home » Santa Clarita News » Environment » Newhall Land’s Mission Village Project Affirmed By California Second Appellate District Judges
Mission Village

Newhall Land’s Mission Village Project Affirmed By California Second Appellate District Judges

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor’s environmental review and approval of Mission Village was affirmed by California Second Appellate District judges Tuesday.


Sponsored Articles


Don’t miss a thing. Get breaking Santa Clarita news alerts delivered right to your inbox.

Mission Village is part of the Newhall Land’s proposed Newhall Ranch community.

A June 2014 ruling by L.A. Superior Court, Hon. John A. Torribio, that upheld the Mission Village Environmental Impact Report, or EIR, and other land use permits, was unanimously affirmed by a three-justice panel of the Second District Court of Appeal.

The permits were originally approved by L.A. County in spring 2012.

The appellate court acted on a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs — the California Native Plant Society, Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Organization for Planning and the Environment and other environmental groups.

SCOPE’s concerns about the project is water use, loss of floodplains and groundwater recharge areas and greenhouse gases, said Lynne Plambeck, SCOPE’s president.

The argument the plaintiffs had were that the county failed to sufficiently analyze the project’s compliance with the county’s Development Monitoring System as it relates to water supplies and sewer capacity, but the appellate court rejected all such claims, said Newhall Land officials.

Newhall Land and Farming Co. claims that there will be no significant increase in greenhouse gases for the 21,000 unit project, according to SCOPE officials in a news release.

“The greenhouse gas issue is especially important as it may set a precedent for other cases in California,” said SCOPE officials in a news release.

SCOPE and other plaintiffs are planning to petition the supreme court, said Plambeck.

The plaintiffs’ claim that the EIR failed to properly analyze sediment and beach replenishment issues were also rejected by the appellate court, Newhall Land officials said.

The EIR’s analysis of impacts and mitigation to the slender mariposa lily and to the project’s greenhouse gas emissions analysis was upheld by the appellate court, said Newhall Land officials.

The plaintiffs’ claim that the EIR failed to analyze and mitigate copper runoff impacts on juvenile steelhead, or trout, was also rejected by the court.

Division 5 of the California Second Appellate Court has not ruled for any conservation groups for the past 20 years, said Plambeck.

The Court of Appeal rejected each argument presented by the plaintiffs, finding that the county had acted appropriately and with substantial evidence to approve the detailed EIR and related mitigation measures in its 72-page opinion, said Newhall Land officials.

“As an owner of a company that is building master planned communities in California, we value our partnership with the county of Los Angeles,” said Emile Haddad, president and CEO of Five Point Communities, the development manager for Newhall Land. “Today, the County’s exhaustive environmental review was affirmed by the Court of Appeal to have been completed diligently and properly. We are thankful for the County’s efforts and look forward to implementing the plans for Mission Village. We also appreciate the Court’s diligence in carefully deciding each of the legal issues presented.”

About Mission Village

Mission Village is located south of State Route 126 and includes a mix of residential, commercial, and non-residential uses, including 4,055 residential homes, 1.56 million square feet of mixed-use commercial space, an elementary school, a fire station, a public library, a bus transfer station, parks with a variety of sports fields and playgrounds, open space, natural habitat preserves and trails.

It is part of Newhall Ranch’s Specific Plan, which has undergone over 15 years of environmental review by the county, state and federal agencies.

At build out, the Newhall Ranch villages will bring tens of thousands of development-related and permanent jobs to the region, according to Newhall Land officials.

The specific plan also calls for over 11,000 acres of protected open space, 60 miles of trails, several public schools and community infrastructure, including a water recycling plant, fire stations, a public library and a sheriff station.

Do you have a news tip? Call us at (661) 298-1220, or drop us a line at [email protected].

KHTS

Newhall Land’s Mission Village Project Affirmed By California Second Appellate District Judges

5 comments

  1. We need to do what we can to get rid of Superior Court, Hon. John A. Torribio and the Division 5 of the California Second Appellate Court. We pay for them, we can fire them. They are not looking out for our best interest only the interest in the developers just like the Santa Clarita City Council. Build, build build. with a water shortage, and no roads to carry the extra load. This valley is OVER BUILT ALREADY. THEY JUST DON”T GET IT SO LETS GET THEM!

  2. I find it just appalling that this state of CA has not learned anything from its mistakes. This projects impact is going to be insane. Our lack of infrastucture such as hospital coverage, police, fire and most of all WATER.. This shows that either we have been lied too regarding the drought or they just don’t care about the future especially for our kids. I thought SCV had more sense. There is no reason that this development needs to be built anytime soon.

  3. Yes, and it is very clear just why Lennar values their ” partnership with the county of Los Angeles” The County let’s them do anything they want, even build houses over an oil field. Would you buy a home next to a closed oil well with all the fracking going on? Just look at the picture of this project.

    And what a crock that statement is about the “County’s exhaustive environmental review” The County doesn’t write the EIR, Lennar does. Lennar even pays for the salary of the County staff that review it. Don’t believe such a thing could be going on? Just call Regional Planning and ask them. Its the truth. No one at all is guarding the hen house in Los Angeles County. They’ve even eliminated having hearings on the the Draft document in front of the Regional Planning Commission.

  4. Where is the water coming from for this development? 21,000 units….. I can only water my landscape twice a week. How are developers going to sustain newly planted landscape (trees, lawns, greenery, etc.) watering only twice per week? How are developers going to keep dust/dirt/soot contained during development? Are existing SCV homeowners going to be in effect “subsidizing” developers water needs?

  5. County’s exhaustive environmental review? = Why did you not post my comment about this. Are you not allowing any more comments?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Heather Harbin

Heather grew up in the Santa Clarita Valley and graduated from West Ranch High School in 2012. She recently graduated from College of the Canyons with an Associate's Degree in New Media Journalism. She was involved in College of the Canyons' "Cougar News" for two years, where she became the senior producer. She will be studying for her Bachelor's Degree at Cal State Northridge in the spring. Heather became a staff writer at KHTS AM-1220 following her internship in the newsroom. She has been writing news and feature articles for the KHTS website since May 2015.