Following a month-long delay, members of the Santa Clarita Planning Commission approved the proposed 375-home Bouquet Canyon Project Tuesday, sending it forward to the City Council for a final vote.
During their regular meeting on Tuesday, the Santa Clarita Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the Bouquet Canyon Project under three conditions.
The Commission elected to make a final vote of approval based on three conditions related to handicap access to electric vehicle charging stations, a playground for children and pet waste facilities.
Commissioner Renee Berlin expressed concern about several issues related to the project, but focused specifically on issues relating to traffic impact.
The Commission and commentators also explored several concerns based on water management and the alternation of Bouquet Creek and the floodplain in the area. Specifically, the issue related to how Bouquet Creek would be inpacted and rerouted, especailly in relation to manmade channels and how choosing the proper type could impact the rehcarging the groundwater sources.
“I think (SCV Water) recognizes that from a percolation standpoint, the project is a bit better than the no project alternative. You know, I understand the point that hard-bottom channels are very undesirable as far as the agency is concerned because with the soft bottom channel it allows for percolation,” said Commissioner Dan Masnada. “Again, the project does provide a slight benefit over the no project alternative. I think… my interpretation of what the agency submitted is that they don’t want to see this as a precedent, and as long as I’m on this commission, I will make sure that it won’t be a precedent.”
The Bouquet Canyon Project is described as “a residential community consisting of up to 375 attached and detached, two-story, for-sale housing units with related infrastructure, dedicated open space areas, trails, recreation areas, and landscape elements located in the community of Saugus.
The project would also include the closure of a portion of Bouquet Canyon Road, between Pam Court and Hob Court, and the construction of a new alignment of Bouquet Canyon Road, in accordance with the City of Santa Clarita’s Circulation Element objectives.
Additionally, the project would require approximately 2 million cubic yards of earthwork to be balanced across the site, channelization of part of the floodplain through the site, removal or encroachment of 27 non-heritage-sized oak trees, and alteration of a significant ridgeline, according to the planning commission agenda.
While the Bouquet Canyon Project was ultimately approved by the commission, it was not without setbacks. Several residents voiced their opposition to the project during the meeting.
“First of all, they used an out-of-town firm for their geologist, and we felt they didn’t understand the area. So we consulted with a well-known, respected local geologist, who is top in his field, who’s actually done fieldwork in this particular area. The geologic conclusions are that the liquefaction dangers are severely underestimated, mostly due to faulty hydrology knowledge,” said Sandra Cattell, chair of the Santa Clarita Sierra Club. “Bouquet Creek is actually a permanent blue line stream. Not an ephemeral or part-time drainage ditch.”
Approval of the project had been delayed several times by the commission itself. When planning commission members were presented the Bouquet Canyon Project on June 2, commissioners requested clarification on several items, including wildfire evacuations, ridgeline alteration and traffic impacts.
See Related: 375-Home Bouquet Canyon Project Back For Planning Commission Discussion After Delay
In addition, planning commissioners requested more information regarding the visual and noise impacts near the proposed extension of Copper Hill Drive, as well as electric vehicle and bicycle parking, according to the agenda item.
During the meetings on July 7 and Aug. 18, the planning commission pushed back the ruling on the Bouquet Canyon Project homes, consisting of an architectural design review, hillside development review and an oak tree permit, to allow more time for the applicant to make changes.
“There are still a couple of items we are finalizing with the applicant, and we need a little bit more time to do that,” said Senior Planner Patrick Leclair during the August meeting.
Commissioner Dr. Dennis Ostrom and Vice-Chair Dan Masnada wanted the local water agency’s technical staff to review the planned running water to be “hard or soft-bottomed river,” or a combination of the two.
The planning committee had recommended that the item be revisited on Aug. 18, to allot more time to address comments of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife who were asked to aid in adequately identifying and mitigating the Project’s potentially significant impacts on fish and wildlife resources, according to the City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission.
With the approval from the commission, the project now goes to the Santa Clarita City Council, who are set to give the final vote on the project at an upcoming meeting.
Ed. Note: Jade Aubuchon contributed to this story.
Sponsored Articles
KHTS FM 98.1 and AM 1220 is Santa Clarita’s only local radio station. KHTS mixes in a combination of news, traffic, sports, and features along with your favorite adult contemporary hits. Santa Clarita news and features are delivered throughout the day over our airwaves, on our website and through a variety of social media platforms. Our KHTS national award-winning daily news briefs are now read daily by 34,000+ residents. A vibrant member of the Santa Clarita community, the KHTS broadcast signal reaches all of the Santa Clarita Valley and parts of the high desert communities located in the Antelope Valley. The station streams its talk shows over the web, reaching a potentially worldwide audience. Follow @KHTSRadio on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

KHTS Radio Santa Clarita Radio – Santa Clarita News
Funny that nobody was concerned about the 74,490 gallons of wastewater per day which is more that each resident will be allotted by the State in the coming years. Suddenly water supply is a non-issue. Good to know.
Keep. Don’t worry, Newsom will make sure all of California is taken care of.
Thanks Ray. I’m so comfortable with Gavin and the progressive decision making, including requiring some of these homes to be section 8, that I am already planning my CA exit strategy like so many others.
Byeeeee. Don’t let door hit you from behind
How much money did the city council pocket for this unnecessary, wasteful project.
We are directly impacted by this, by traffic, construction noise, where’s the water coming from?and sewage.
This just blows my mind that this was approved! I guess the voice of the people weren’t listened to, only sound of cash blowing in the wind.
Isn’t the election coming next month? Oh wait I have my ballot, good thing I haven’t voted yet, changes on my ballot are about to happen.
Unfortunately the County is behind putting in more homes along with state mandates…the city council cannot decide to not build anything in the city limits…and they are not being paid off…that’s not how this works! If you are unhappy with the situation, you need to start from the top and stop voting for the same old, same old that is pushing this state, valley into massive congestion!
OMG! Here we go again. Is there anything these idiots don’t approve? How about the water. the traffic, the crime, the blackouts. This is disgusting!
Rose – this starts with higher up on the food chain….the governor, the LA County Board of Supervisors are the ones pushing for turning SCV into a parking lot. The city council cannot deny any new builds as they see fit…the state and county will push in whatever they want….
Can someone on here give me a hint on who to vote for locally? I’m tired of these people selling us out and I don’t know much about the candidates. Thanks!
Hahahahaha they can’t even control the current traffic, glad I live right off the 5. This is why people complain about natural life in their backyard hmmm!! They can’t even sell the homes off the 14.. homes literally no yard and on top of each other.
They need a toll road now through SCV..
What a joke. They believe that more concrete will help water recharge because the developer says so and that these are “carriage houses”, not apartments. Our City is a joke if they believe this fantasy world. This is why the world is in trouble. On the local level, no one will say no to bad planning. Don’t vote for incumbents, they appointed these people.
We converted our neighborhood greenbelts into wood-chips to conserve water 2 years ago bc of the water supply and fears of running out of water. Still look at these brown medians and landscaping to this day, but now there isn’t a issue with water!!! WTH is going on here? Making up issues one day and then move on to a new fictitious issue? Or is there still a water supply shortage? How are these issues addressed with MORE housing developments? We can’t even sell the houses off Plum Cyn, new development.
If the “tree hugging” Liberals keep up their insanity, we’ll have no forests left! The Liberal administration keeps hysterical whining about drought/rolling blackouts, but allows 1000s of new crappy housing throughout the entire SCV including all the way up to Magic Mountain!! Can anyone imagine in 2-5 years what the traffic will be like on ALL roads/freeways!! Get Elon Musk to bore tunnels through the mountains from the 126 to 118 & 14 to 210, our only hope, can anyone imagine a major earthquake & the Newhall Pass!?!